PureYAML/Tests/PureYAMLJSONTests/JSONRuleTests.swift
Mihaela Mihaljevic a8950e118c Merge conformance/yaml-test-suite-gaps: the libyaml port becomes the engine on main
The ported engine wins every conflict: main's post-fork patches to the
hand-rolled Scanner and TokenEventParser land on deleted files and are
dropped; their behaviors are carried by the port and guarded by the
whole-suite conformance gate (402/402 passing).

Merge adaptations, all gates green (style, namespacing, forbidden
patterns, changelog, roadmap, swiftformat, swiftlint strict, build,
full test suite, whole-suite conformance sweep):

- PureYAMLJSON representability rules move onto the Check algebra,
  replacing the retired legacy Rule type.
- The permissive tag-handle pre-pass is removed; the port rejects an
  undefined handle at parse time (suite case QLJ7) and the validation
  report carries it as a parse diagnostic.
- EventStreamComposer's nested types split one-per-file per the
  namespacing gate.
- Tests pinned to old-engine behavior were re-verified against the
  reference and updated: libyaml rejects an explicit-key continuation
  ending at a value colon, and suite case QB6E requires rejecting a
  quoted continuation at column 0.
- CHANGELOG unreleased entries from both lines are preserved in two
  groups with a provenance note.

Closes #1, closes #3
2026-07-05 00:23:48 +02:00

54 lines
2.6 KiB
Swift

import PureYAML
@testable import PureYAMLJSON
import Testing
@Suite("JSON representability rules")
struct JSONRuleTests {
private func mapping(_ pairs: [PureYAML.Model.Pair]) -> PureYAML.Model.Value {
.mapping(.init(pairs))
}
@Test("mappingKeysAreStrings fails on a complex key")
func test_mappingKeysAreStrings_fails() {
let document = mapping([.init(keyNode: .sequence([.int(1)]), value: .int(2))])
let issues = PureYAML.Validation.Validator(checks: [PureYAML.Validation.AnyCheck(PureYAML.Validation.BuiltinCheck.mappingKeysAreStrings)]).collect(document).issues
#expect(issues.count == 1)
#expect(issues.first?.reason == "Mapping key '[1]' is not a string")
}
@Test("mappingKeysAreStrings passes when every key is a string")
func test_mappingKeysAreStrings_passes() {
let document = mapping([.init(key: "a", value: .int(1))])
let issues = PureYAML.Validation.Validator(checks: [PureYAML.Validation.AnyCheck(PureYAML.Validation.BuiltinCheck.mappingKeysAreStrings)]).collect(document).issues
#expect(issues.isEmpty)
}
@Test("numbersAreFinite fails on infinity at the value's path")
func test_numbersAreFinite_fails() {
let document = mapping([.init(key: "x", value: .double(.infinity))])
let issues = PureYAML.Validation.Validator(checks: [PureYAML.Validation.AnyCheck(PureYAML.Validation.BuiltinCheck.numbersAreFinite)]).collect(document).issues
#expect(issues.count == 1)
#expect(issues.first?.reason == "Number 'inf' is not finite")
}
@Test("numbersAreFinite passes on a large finite double")
func test_numbersAreFinite_passes() {
let document = mapping([.init(key: "x", value: .double(.greatestFiniteMagnitude))])
let issues = PureYAML.Validation.Validator(checks: [PureYAML.Validation.AnyCheck(PureYAML.Validation.BuiltinCheck.numbersAreFinite)]).collect(document).issues
#expect(issues.isEmpty)
}
@Test("The representability set catches a duplicate key")
func test_representability_catchesDuplicate() {
let document = mapping([.init(key: "a", value: .int(1)), .init(key: "a", value: .int(2))])
#expect(!PureYAML.JSON.Validator.isRepresentable(document))
}
@Test("A plain string-keyed finite tree is representable")
func test_representability_acceptsPlainTree() {
let document = mapping([.init(key: "a", value: .int(1)), .init(key: "b", value: .double(1.5))])
#expect(PureYAML.JSON.Validator.isRepresentable(document))
#expect(PureYAML.JSON.Validator.issues(for: document).isEmpty)
}
}