Mihaela M
25b1388dbb
The value-property indentation check used only the first property's mark,
so it caught a sole under-indented property ('seq:' then '&anchor') but not
a second one after an inline first ('key: &x' then a '!!tag' in column 1),
which still parsed.
The last consumed property is cursor.previous after consumeProperties, so
the check now uses it instead of the first mark, catching an under-indented
property whether it is the only one or a later one. Inline properties, a
property indented under the key, and a properly indented anchor-and-tag pair
are unaffected.
Measured against the official YAML test-suite, parse-level conformance
rises from 277/333 (83.2%) to 278/333 (83.5%) with no regression.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Coding | ||
| Decoding | ||
| Emitting | ||
| Encoding | ||
| Model | ||
| Parsing | ||
| Stream | ||
| Tagged | ||
| Validation | ||
| API.swift | ||
| PureYAML.swift | ||