PureYAML/Sources/Validation/Result.swift
Mihaela Mihaljevic bf2dc4ece7 refactor(validation): rename framework to match the validation idiom
The validation module already implemented the composable-rule idiom under
its own names (Check/Issue/SubjectContext) and a value-type Validator with
duplicated traversal machinery per layer. Renamed the core types to the
canonical names (Validation/ValidationError/ValidationErrorCollection/
ValidationContext/BuiltinValidation/AnyValidation), converted Validator to
a reference-type class with the two-tier default-rule split, and genericized
it over both Subject and Document via a new Traversable protocol so the
model and tagged layers share one walk engine instead of two copies. Wired
the JSON-representability rule set into the same shape and closed the two
missing pieces (unwrap combinator, JSON coverage/config-pin tests).
2026-07-12 18:10:00 +02:00

24 lines
667 B
Swift

public extension PureYAML.Validation {
/// Collected validation errors, the non-throwing outcome accessor beside the throwing
/// `Validator.validate(_:strict:)` gate.
struct Result: Equatable, Sendable {
public var values: [ValidationError]
public init(_ values: [ValidationError] = []) {
self.values = values
}
public var errors: [ValidationError] {
values.filter { $0.severity == .error }
}
public var warnings: [ValidationError] {
values.filter { $0.severity == .warning }
}
public var isValid: Bool {
errors.isEmpty
}
}
}