Element stored its children inline and Node was `indirect`, so a Node's
recursive layout made building, comparing, hashing, and releasing a deeply
nested tree recurse one native frame per level and overflow the stack
(signal 10) -- on a constrained stack such as a Swift Task, as shallow as a
few thousand deep.
Element now holds its children behind a copy-on-write reference
(ElementStorage), so Node is a fixed-size value (no longer indirect) and:
- `==` and `hashValue` walk the tree iteratively through explicit work
stacks (the synthesized conformances recursed); equal trees still hash
equally.
- ElementStorage's `deinit` flattens the subtree into a heap worklist
before releasing, draining only storage it solely owns so a copy-on-write
sibling keeps its subtree.
- `children` is a computed copy-on-write view with a `_modify` accessor, so
in-place mutation (the parser's append loop) stays amortized O(1).
Value semantics are unchanged; Element/Node remain Equatable, Hashable,
Sendable. A 50000-deep tree builds, compares, hashes, and releases in a
fraction of a second; 1782 tests pass. Completes the value-Node half of #341.
Mihaela Mihaljevic
d27e108b4d